Alexander Skarsgård Says Playing a Wholesome Character Was More Terrifying Than Playing a Wicker Man (And He’s Serious)

Alexander Skarsgård has built a career on darkness, complexity, and moral ambiguity.

But his latest role pushed him into terrifying new territory: playing someone actually nice.

In the oddball fable Wicker, which premiered at Sundance Film Festival this weekend, Skarsgård portrays a husband literally woven from sticks—and the biggest challenge wasn’t the physical transformation.

It was tapping into genuine goodness.

When Playing Nice Feels Harder Than Playing Evil

During the Saturday Q&A attended by Entertainment Weekly, Skarsgård revealed what truly intimidated him about directors Eleanor Wilson and Alex Huston Fischer’s whimsical project.

I was quite intimidated when I read it because I tend to be drawn towards more conflicted characters with more internal turmoil and darkness. And to play this good-hearted, good natured, sweet, morally righteous character was scary to me. I’m not really comfortable doing that.

The audience laughed as he delivered the punchline with perfect timing.

I don’t have anything to tap into when it comes to that, so it was a stretch as an actor.

He was joking, of course. But there’s truth beneath the humor.

A Career Built on Darkness

Skarsgård’s resume reads like a masterclass in playing morally compromised characters. His breakout role as cunning, ruthless vampire Eric Northman on True Blood established him as someone who could embody danger and complexity.

More recently, his roles have only gotten darker:

  • Big Little Lies: An abusive husband whose violence shocked audiences
  • Succession: A sociopathic tech mogul navigating corporate warfare
  • The Northman: A vengeance-seeking viking caked in dirt and blood

Playing a sweet-natured basketman? Completely outside his wheelhouse.

Why The Script Won Him Over

Despite his initial hesitation about playing someone genuinely good, Skarsgård couldn’t resist the project.

I thought it was an incredible script. It’s a fable, but it’s also an allegory. It’s a story about our society, but without being heavy-handed or didactic or preachy. It was so funny and sweet, and obviously a very interesting character to play.

Wicker tells the delightfully bizarre story of a fisherwoman who asks a basketmaker to weave her a husband. The premise alone is pure Sundance gold—weird, whimsical, and somehow deeply human.

The Physical Challenge: Acting Through Wicker

Beyond the emotional stretch, Skarsgård faced a uniquely practical problem. Actors rely heavily on facial expressions to convey emotion.

But when your face is covered in wicker? That tool becomes severely limited.

Rigidity was a big part of it, and that came naturally to me. And awkwardness, also easy.

His self-deprecating humor kept the audience engaged throughout the Q&A. But behind the jokes was genuine technique.

The Evolution of Wicker Husband

Skarsgård and the directors developed a clever approach to showing character development through physical transformation. The fresh wicker creaks and constrains at first, then gradually loosens.

And then we played around a little bit with the evolution of the character. Watching it now was quite interesting, cause they clearly worked on it with the sound design as well and the creaking in the beginning when the wicker is all fresh and new.

Sound design became crucial. Creaking wicker communicated what subtle facial movements couldn’t.

The same principle applied to Skarsgård’s performance choices. As wicker husband becomes more comfortable, both physicality and facial expressions gradually open up.

Exaggerating Everything

During emotionally vulnerable scenes opposite co-star Olivia Colman, Skarsgård faced an actor’s nightmare. While Colman’s expressive face could “explode on camera,” his remained frustratingly still beneath layers of wicker.

Nothing happened. I have exaggerated everything. And that kind of contradicts your instinct as an actor. So I felt ridiculous, but it was just about trusting these guys and when they came up and were like, ‘Can you just give us a bit more eyebrow action?’ I’m like, ‘Okay.’

The solution? Exaggerate movements to an almost uncomfortable degree. Directors requesting “more eyebrow action” became a regular occurrence.

For an actor trained in subtlety and nuance, feeling ridiculous was part of the process. Trust became essential—trust in directors, trust in makeup design, trust in post-production.

Breaking Type As Career Evolution

Skarsgård’s willingness to embrace discomfort speaks to artistic maturity. Many actors become trapped by their own success, typecast in roles that made them famous.

But growth requires risk. Playing against type forces actors to develop new muscles, discover unexplored range.

For someone who’s made darkness his trademark, exploring lightness and goodness offers fresh creative territory. The fact that it scared him? That’s precisely why it was worth doing.

Wicker represents more than just a quirky Sundance entry. It’s evidence that even established actors can—and should—push beyond comfortable boundaries.

Sometimes the most challenging role isn’t playing a monster. Sometimes it’s playing someone genuinely, uncomplicated good.

Even if you’re made of sticks.

Leave a Comment